top of page

Moha Intel

AI research workspace for investment analysts and research teams.

Overview

Enables researchers to work across documents, conversations, data sources in unified environment. Led product design, information architecture, interaction frameworks. Built for MoreHarvest International, Chateau Life, Nexara Capital.
Challenge:
Translating abstract AI behavior into tangible, trustworthy interfaces.

Discipline

Product design · Research systems · AX

Client

MoreHarvest International & Chateau Life & Nexara Capital

Location

Taiwan · Japan · Hong Kong · Singapore

Date

2025 - present

Team

Lead Designer · Researcher · Frontend Developer · Backend Developer

Role and scope

Lead product designer. Product definition, information structure, interaction patterns, and UX language. Led testing cycles, transforming the product from an AI demo into a research tool.

Constraints

Translating AI behavior into tangible actions, building trust through visible sourcing, creating memory where chats resets, distinguishing action types, and maintaining context.

Development process

The system wasn't built all at once. Each phase established foundation before adding complexity. Tokens locked before components. Components validated before templates. Automation enforced rules from day one. No manual governance, no exceptions. Built methodically to prevent the chaos it replaced.

01

The problem

02

Discovery through testing failure

03

From chat to research workspace

04

Validation

05

Designing for trust

Research teams work in fragments. Tools don't share memory. Every tool switch breaks focus. AI chat made this worse. Sessions reset. Notes disappeared. Sources untraceable. Fundamental metaphor wrong: research is not conversation. Research is a continuous process.

01

The problem

The first version failed immediately. Users couldn't complete tasks. Terminology obscured intent. Nothing felt persistent. Core insight: they needed memory. They needed to build on their own work.

02

Discovery through testing failure

Restructured entirely:
Quick Notes → Fast capture, always saved.
Workstation → Primary surface where everything stays visible.
Channels → Organized threads by topic.
Summaries → Condensed insights with traceable sources.

03

From chat to research workspace

Previously impossible tasks became intuitive. Users trusted the system. They saved freely, built on previous research, and cited sources confidently.

04

Validation

Source attribution → Clickable sources.
Save state visibility → Real-time indicators.
Version history → See how thinking developed.
Human/AI separation → Clear visual distinction.

05

Designing for trust

Challenges

Primary: conceptual, not technical. Terminology became critical. Multi-topic synthesis required new patterns.

Insights

Researchers struggled with trust, not input. The solution wasn't better AI; it was better feedback. AI interface design is fundamentally different from traditional product design.

What's next?

Evolving into a collaborative surface. Shared channels, insight extraction, live co-editing, smarter memory.

bottom of page